Search for: "Fraser v. Fraser" Results 1 - 20 of 555
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2024, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
Heisler and Grossman speak to the prima facie test for discrimination in the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Fraser v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 SCC 28 and talk about legislative and policy approaches to measuring disparity. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:41 am
Today's advance release foreclosure law opinion: No. 2 Fraser Place Condominium Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 3:30 am by Emma Cave
Emma Cave In Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority (1986) the UK House of Lords held that minors under the age of 16 could access contraceptive advice and treatment in their own right provided they satisfied a test which became known as “Gillick competence. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am by David Pocklington
The Chair of the Commission, Orlando Fraser KC, told the Commission’s Annual General Meeting on Wednesday that the Commission was aware of several “allegations of antisemitic or hate speech” linked to charities in England and Wales. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am by Frank Cranmer
The Chair of the Commission, Orlando Fraser KC, told the Commission’s Annual General Meeting on Wednesday that the Commission was aware of several “allegations of antisemitic or hate speech” linked to charities in England and Wales. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
Surveillance The outgoing biometrics and surveillance commissioner Fraser Sampson has called the UK government’s plans to remove safeguards around biometrics and public space surveillance as “tantamount to vandalism. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 10:13 am
Today's advance release contract law opinion: Fraser Lane Associates, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Fraser Nelson claimed that the ruling “puts IPSO in violation of its own charter” and “has torn up” protections for opinion. [read post]