Search for: "Freeman v. Young" Results 1 - 20 of 85
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
McCoy said Freeman’s clients could seek an exemption. [read post]
Historical analyses of the phrase look to 1215 when, in the Magna Carta, King John of England promised to condemn no freeman but “by the Law of the Land. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
New online from Law and History Review and Cambridge Core: From Disestablishment to Dartmouth College v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
ASA published its Annual Report 2020 which highlights steps taken to make sure young and vulnerable people are protected from misleading, harmful or irresponsible ads. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am by Marty Lederman
 Alexander Haig, Nixon’s chief of staff, called Ruckelshaus that evening and told him that “your commander in chief has given you an order” to fire Cox.Ruckelshaus was just 41 years old, had five young children, and was deeply honored to be serving as Deputy AG. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm by Ron Friedmann
A classic scene in the movie THE GRADUATE explains to the young protagonist (Dustin Hoffman) that the future lies in plastics. [read post]
While there are a few examples of “Freeman on the Land” (who do not accept the authority of the courts) appearing in the Alberta courts, Meads raises concerns that there could easily be conflation between some of the characteristics attributed to such litigants (for example, filing a lot of paperwork, suing a lot of people) and the behaviour of an SRL reading up on the net about how to “best” bring a law suit. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
” [4] The definition of substantial costs is 1.5 times more than (regular) partial indemnity costs; Punitive costs have been described by the Supreme Court of Canada as appropriate “only where there has been reprehensible, scandalous or outrageous conduct on the part of one of the parties” (Young v Young, [1993] 4 SCR 3, 1993 at para 260) [5] Delichte v Rogers, 2013 MBQB 93, M. [read post]