Search for: "G. Ambrose" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2023, 8:33 am by Alex Tsang
Procureur général du Québec c. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 6:30 am by ernst
Nussbaum, and Laura WeinribChapter 1: Law, Literature, and War: A Plenary Panelm with Justice, Stephen G. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 11:30 pm
 Merry Christmas and G-d bless the United States of America that we can produce citizens like that. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:49 am
 G) Who did judicial candidate Marcos Ambrose lose to? [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
Discovery Beyond the Report and the Deposition The lesson of the cases interpreting Rule 26 is that counsel cannot count exclusively upon the report and automatic disclosure requirements to obtain the materials necessary or helpful for cross-examination of statisticians who have created their own analyses. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 5:50 am by Adam Gillette
  The citation reads,FIRST LIEUTENANT WILLIAM G. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:34 am by Adam Gillette
  The citation reads,FIRST LIEUTENANT WILLIAM G. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
In honor of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's recent grant of an appeal on the Restatement (Second)/Restatement (Third) in Tincher v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Not only would it be impractical to do so: it would sometimes be inappropriate, as it would destroy the ability of the Court to engage in the constructive dialogue with the EurCtHR which is of value to the development of Convention law (see e g R v Horncastle [2009] UKSC 14; [2010] 2 WLR 47). [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:43 am by maimons
Here is Ambrose Evans-Pritchard on the European "rescue": Albert Edwards from Société Générale said the ECB will have to act, over a German veto if necessary. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:57 am by sally
Ambrose v Harris (Procurator Fiscal, Oban); HM Advocate v M; HM Advocate v G [2011] UKSC 43; [2011] WLR (D) 288 “In principle the line as to when access to legal advice had to be provided before a person suspected of a criminal offence was questioned by police should be drawn as from the moment when he had been taken into police custody, or his freedom of action had been significantly curtailed.” WLR Daily, 6th October 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am by Melina Padron
Ambrose v Harris (Procurator Fiscal, Oban) (Scotland) Her Majesty’s Advocate v G (Scotland) Her Majesty’s Advocate v M (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 43 October 6, 2011 Supreme Court: Scottish prosecutions based on questioning by police pre-detention without access to lawyer not ECHR breach. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am by Rosalind English
Ambrose Harris (Procurator Fiscal), HM Advocate v G : HM Advocate v M [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) – read judgment Reliance on evidence that emerged from questioning a person without access to a lawyer did not invariably breach the right to a fair trial under Article 6. [read post]