Search for: "Gaines v. State of South Carolina et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:51 pm
State and Federal Charges of Money Laundering using Cryptocurrency Money laundering has been defined as a felony crime by Texas state law and federal statute. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
The tax gain for North Carolina is likely less than the tax loss for New York, while the lower effective (tax-reduced) price reduces costs for New York smokers. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Complaint ¶ 1, Alianza Americas v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
Notably, Romer and Romer’s study was completed with U.S. federal income tax data, not state level data. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:59 am
The Fourth Circuit encompasses Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 1:55 am
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:21 am
FOOTNOTES [1] Dipendra Tiwari, et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:32 pm
April 12, 2018) (putative class action removed from South Carolina state court brought under the South Carolina Payment of Wages Act against Blue Max for allegedly requiring employees to work “off the clock” and failing to pay all wages due) Hogan, et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 12:32 pm
April 12, 2018) (putative class action removed from South Carolina state court brought under the South Carolina Payment of Wages Act against Blue Max for allegedly requiring employees to work “off the clock” and failing to pay all wages due) Hogan, et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 12:32 pm
April 12, 2018) (putative class action removed from South Carolina state court brought under the South Carolina Payment of Wages Act against Blue Max for allegedly requiring employees to work “off the clock” and failing to pay all wages due) Hogan, et al. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:51 am
South Carolina Public Service Authority, et al.; No. 3:17-cv-02764 (D.S.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 11:37 am
Tate, et al. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm
Yesterday, almost two years after hearing arguments, the Supreme Court of South Carolina finally issued its decision in the case of The Protestant Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:02 pm
Fripp Island Resort, Inc, et al., No. 9:11-cv-127-MBS (D.S.C. 2011) was settled for an undisclosed amount. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
In some states, the exclusion applies to family members.[5] But, in these states that exclude from workers’ compensation certain types of agricultural labor, it is typically possible for the employer to voluntarily elect to be covered in order to gain tort immunity.[6] Two Ag States and Two Different Approaches Kansas. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
South Carolina law purported to preclude arbitration under the state’s power to regulate the business of insurance. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
It has also sued the state of South Dakota for the same reason. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
[ET AL.] [read post]
