Search for: "Garner v. Mitchell" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Cawthorn Tells Feds He Forgot About $236K; Sends Amended Campaign Finance Report Yahoo News – Joe Burgess (Asheville Citizen-Times) | Published: 8/22/2022 Days after filing a mandatory federal campaign finance document whose month-late arrival could garner him more than $17,000 in fines, U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Roger Parloff
In every bid to transfer venue that Capitol riot defendants have raised, the key precedent the government has cited in response has been the same: Haldeman v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here's a summary of the undisputed facts, to give a sense of the underlying claim (in Levine v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
That case was ridiculously easy, as I wrote in The Atlantic, but almost every term the Supreme Court faces much more difficult interpretative questions and, of course, the lower courts face these issues on a regular basis.There is a tremendous volume of legal scholarship on the proper way to read statutes as well as, sadly in my view, a book apparently used by many judges written by the late Justice Scalia and Bryan Garner called Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
 There is  justifiably much attention paid to those ten or so articles that garnered the most notice from this academic community each year especially in social media outlets of importance to the academy (e.g., here). [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
From Bryan Garner to Anne Lamott, legal writing has a great tradition of celebrating books of writing advice. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:42 am by Michael Froomkin
And in the highly contested Group V seat … Jeannett Slesnick garnered 32 percent of the vote in the crowded field. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 10:33 am by Lyle Denniston
  But the one number that counted:  the Environmental Protection Agency seemed close to being able to garner five Justices on its side in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]