Search for: "George A. Brown v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 644
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
“On May 16, in celebration of the 70th anniversary of the Supreme Court Brown v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Ilya Somin (George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School) has posted Brown, Democracy, and Foot Voting (American Journal of Law and Equality, Symposium on the 70th Anniversary of Brown v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:56 am by Amy Howe
California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm by Ilya Somin
" Kavanaugh was likely referring to his service as a White House official in the George W. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm by David Kopel
A few days after the Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
  State court analogues to these rules replicated the debate in state courts around the country. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I instead came away with the impression that the historian George Brown Tindall was correct to conclude that during the 1920s southern apartheid “was settled. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Then the solidly and increasingly conservative George Sutherland replaced the progressive John Clark, an event that proved to be “a significant turning point” (39) and “steered the Court sharply to the right” (45). [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm by Steven Calabresi
[Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Incompatibility Clause both apply to "officers under the United States" and must thus mean the same thing] The oral argument today in Trump v. [read post]