Search for: "Georgia Home Ins. Co. v. Means" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[32] The parties’ intentions are considered a matter of law, and intent is referred to the trier of fact only if a court determines that the document is ambiguous as a matter of law.[33] Under the objective standard, statements of the parties’ intentions carry the greatest weight.[34] In Teachers Ins. and Annuity Ass’n of America v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 5:48 am by skelly
Co. (11th Cir. 2004) 358 F.3d 854, 858-859 [FAA reverse preempted by Georgia law prohibiting arbitration clauses in insurance contracts]; Std. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
(citations omitted).Third, the economic incentives are all wrong, as non-manufacturer liability rewards questionable practices by generic manufacturers and penalizes more careful competitors:Careful Drug Co. gets word from the field that its drug, “X”, might cure high blood pressure when a doctor comes to it with a case series. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:27 pm
American Home Services Co., a Georgia trial court determined that the insured had intentionally violated the TCPA by issuing 306,000 junk faxes. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:27 pm
American Home Services Co., a Georgia trial court determined that the insured had intentionally violated the TCPA by issuing 306,000 junk faxes. [read post]