Search for: "Georgia Public Service Commission v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
At least eight other states—Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, South Dakota—are also considering fair access bills, some of which would apply to payment processors, payment networks, and credit card companies and networks in addition to banks and insurers. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
For instance, in Georgia, a woman who has an abortion may be prosecuted for murder, since the state recognizes unborn children as human beings, argued Dellinger and Pell. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by INFORRM
The United States has provided assurances that Julian Assange would not receive the death penalty in the event that he is extradited. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:29 pm by Ryan Goodman
Judge Greenwood described the low standard of proof (and the potentially temporary nature of the Court’s findings) at this initial stage of proceedings (in Georgia v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first oral contraceptive available in the United States without a prescription. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Georgia's Public Service Commission consists of five members who are elected through statewide, at-large elections. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
The SIFI classification—which is currently limited to the largest banks in the United States—enables increased scrutiny by the U.S. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
The Georgia Supreme Court upheld the state’s six-week abortion ban. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am by Keith Szeliga and Daniel Alvarado
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals has explained the relationship between the two subsections as follows: The more that a claimed cost satisfies the business necessity requirement in subsection (c), the more the contractor’s burden to satisfy the benefit requirement in subsection (b) is reduced. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]