Search for: "German v. German"
Results 1 - 20
of 5,178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2024, 9:56 pm
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:00 pm
In Park County Environmental Council v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 2:08 am
The decision invites a more general reflection, beyond German constitutional law, on the questions of method and legal policy that the apprehension of these marriages gives rise to in private international law. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm
Sources, Characteristics and Identification E. coli is an archetypal commensal bacterial species that lives in mammalian intestines. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:08 am
The differences identified are contextualized, inter alia, in light of the American and German international law traditions. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 11:49 am
AsymaDesign v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 4:20 am
The reader of the order does not need sophisticated analytical techniques to recognize that the order is laced with the German couleur locale. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:55 am
However, national courts, in particular UK and German courts, have in some cases developed their own and differing standards. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:23 am
The applicant relied on the AS v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU (case C‑541/18, IPKat here). [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:42 am
In the German proceedings the patent had been limited following a preliminary opinion of the Federal Patent Court which considered the patent valid on the basis of an auxiliary request (AR 1). 10x Genomics asserted the patent before the Munich Local Division as limited in the German nullity proceedings. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:00 am
Nix v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:00 am
/Idaho v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
Conversely, in the second 10x Genomics v NanoString decision issued in Munich, the Court considered itself to have jurisdiction to decide a PI application for an EP despite infringement and revocation proceedings having been brought in German national courts under the German designation of the EP, which had resulted in an injunction being granted to 10x Genomics. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
by Achim Czubaiko, Research Fellow („Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter“) and PhD Candidate, supported by the German Scholarship Foundation, Institute for German and International Civil Procedural Law, University of Bonn. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:05 am
In Zăicescu and Fălticineanu v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:55 am
In Tuskia v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:17 am
Furthermore, the Romanian procedure cannot be considered compatible with EU law, as the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights X. and Y. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:30 pm
Bissonnette v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
By Amanda Buonaiuto What is Looted Art? [read post]
