Search for: "Getters v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2022, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 3:43 pm
Doe v. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
Celebrezze and Burdick v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
York & York v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Sanders and Reynolds v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
If no candidate satisfies both of these requirements, the state House of Representatives selects the governor from the two top popular-vote getters. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
If no candidate satisfies both of these requirements, the state House of Representatives selects the governor from the two top popular-vote getters. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:11 pm
See State of California v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 4:29 am
New York State? [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
Candidate A receives 34 first-place votes, followed by B with 30 votes, C with 29 votes, and D far behind with 7 votes.If we simply picked the top vote-getter at this point (as most elections do), A would be the winner. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:47 am
Jones is not up for re-election until 2020, but he represents a deep-red state. [read post]
4 May 2018, 5:00 am
Federal Circuit’s Fair Use Decision in Oracle v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 7:04 am
In Anderson v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 7:31 am
Andrew Jackson 99 and John Quincy Adams 84 were the top two vote-getters with Adams getting the nod from the House). [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 12:44 pm
Morgan V. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:05 am
The result In Walsworth v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:49 am
The agency conceded that the employee met her prima facie burden; thus, the court turned to its stated reason for transferring the employee. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
Morgan v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:30 am
Indeed, a state official (think of Rick Perry) might quite explicitly say that he is not willing to subordinate his loyalty to the state constitution to the national Constitution, either on (reasonable) grounds that the Constitution is radically defective (which it is) or less reasonable grounds that he is no longer sure he wants to affirm the very notion of Union that the Constitution instantiates. [read post]
