Search for: "Good v. Austin" Results 1 - 20 of 961
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
” To justify that anti-historical and non-textual principle, Roberts relied on some bizarre statements he made in a previous case, Northwest Austin v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Martin Wells set out to do a meta-analysis, which was all fine and good. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It noted, quoting Justice Byron White’s concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Last year, the Pew Research Center released a survey finding that nearly a third of Americans who had ever invested in, traded, or used crypto, no longer held any.[10] The same survey found that a whopping three-quarters of Americans who have heard about crypto do not believe that it is reliable and safe.[11] Given the continued noncompliance in this space, they have good reason to be concerned. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by fjhinojosa
Casto’s article Robert Jackson’s Critique of Trump v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:15 pm by Josh Blackman
 For example, if an individual litigant is seeking a declaration that certain agency practices are unconstitutional in proceedings they are involved in, which would have an effect of finding say that an agency's ALJs are unlawfully appointed or insulated from presidential control (such as in Jarkesy v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 20569-23 Lightfoot v Edinburghlive.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 21022-23 Maidment v Western Mail, 6 Children (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief and shock (2021), No breach – after investigation 21041-23 Joyce v Glamorgan Gazette, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 217440-23 Austin v The Daily… [read post]