Search for: "Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. United States of America" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
At least eight other states—Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, South Dakota—are also considering fair access bills, some of which would apply to payment processors, payment networks, and credit card companies and networks in addition to banks and insurers. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Working Arrangements Across Employment Sectors by Percentage of Workers In their own survey, Barrero et al. measured the full-time working arrangements in the United States as of 2023, identifying the percentage of employees who work fully onsite, fully remote, and those who have a hybrid arrangement. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
  Irving John Selikoff was born as Irving Selecoff in the brain basket of America, Brooklyn, New York, to Abraham and Matilda (Tillie) Selecoff.[7]  His father, Abraham, was born on April 6, 1885, in the Kyiv oblast of what is now Ukraine.[8] 1920. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
Liability for “Active Managers” Under Delaware Law Private equity sponsors commonly appoint their partners or employees to serve as directors or officers of portfolio companies. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 2:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Rather, the real winner is a growing cohort of lawyers who are filing meritless lawsuits in federal and state courts across the United States every time a merger or acquisition is announced or a corporate misfortune impacts a company’s share price… In the last five years, half of the nearly $23 billion in securities claims costs have gone to lawyers — both plaintiff and defense.[4]   Since 2017, the plaintiffs’ bar has expanded their… [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 5:16 am by Marty Lederman
  See also Part II-B of the amicus brief for the Christian Legal Society, et al. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm by Law Lady
THE WINDMERE OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., CITIZEN PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION; McCRORY BUILDING CO., INC., DELTA/UNITED SPECIALTIES, INC., ALL-SOUTH SUBCONTRACTORS, INC., BRADLEY MASONRY, INC., ET AL., Appellees. 1st District.Attorneys -- Attorney's fees contract -- Trial court erred in denying petition for approval of a straight 40% contingency fee contract for representation of petitioner in a medical malpractice action -- Trial court is required by rule to… [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am by Soroush Seifi
”[14] After certification, the union is the one and only party that can bargain for all employees, including those who did not vote for the certification of the union.[15]  The extent of this bargaining power is noteworthy: in Falconbridge, the union was assumed to have the power to effectively waive the ESA on behalf of its employees regardless of the individual employees knowledge or consent to such a concession with potential adverse effect on the… [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm by Mandelman
 Obviously, I couldn’t know for sure… but it also seems obvious that LPS is a very large and very powerful company with employees all over the country, and Tracy blew the whistle. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:57 pm
It was Corzine's stated goal to transform MF Global from a commodity broker into an investment bank with a large proprietary trading operation similar to the one Corzine ran at Goldman in the 1990s. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am by Christa Culver
United StatesDocket: 10-533Issue(s): Whether the Government must prove that a defendant had the specific intent to engage in a quid pro quo to convict him of bribery under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm by Law Lady
Ironman North America, USA TRIATHLON, a foreign company, Defendants-Appellees. 11th Circuit.Insurance -- Appraisal -- Error to grant insured's motion to compel appraisal before court resolved underlying coverage dispute -- Conflict certified -- Insurer did not waive right to deny coverage by failing to deny coverage before suit was filedCITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. [read post]