Search for: "Graves v. Phillips"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2024, 6:37 am
The Court of Appeals holds that plaintiff has a case against Barton under the New York City Human Rights Law.The case is Phillips v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm
The threat of a grave injury to our well-being and prosperity as a nation and well-nigh American supremacy is there. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 7:49 am
See McGovern v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:16 am
In June, the Supreme Court provided appellate judges with a neutron bomb against agency regulations with its decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
After a few days of misreporting on the opinion in West Virginia v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Readers interested in learning about another Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act case currently before the Supreme Court, Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Recent cases citing these rights together include Watson v Campos [2016] IEHC 18 (14 January 2016) [28] (Barrett J); Rooney v Shell E&P Ireland [2017] IEHC 63 (20 January 2017) [31]-[32] (Ní Raifeartaigh J); Ryanair v Channel 4 Television [2017] IEHC 651 (05 October 2017) [49]-[52] (Meenan J). [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
Think of Walz v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:12 pm
Phillips, 865 F.3d 277, 282-83 (5th Cir. 2017) (quoting Delgado v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:34 am
I was there diggin’ that tunnel for just six bits a day; I was diggin’ that tunnel for just six bits a day; Didn’t know I was diggin’ my own grave, Silicosis was eatin’ my lungs away. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 1:05 pm
We have grave doubts. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 7:33 am
In Granata v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 7:33 am
In Granata v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:23 am
” A trial court’s grant of a CPLR 4401 motion for judgment as a matter of law is appropriate where the trial court finds that, upon the evidence presented, there is no rational process by which the fact trier could base a finding in favor of the nonmoving party'” (Geeta Temple-Ashram v Satyanandji, 142 AD3d 1132, 1134, quoting Szczerbiak v Pilat, 90 NY2d 553, 556; accord Clarke v Phillips, 112 AD3d 872, 874). [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
La norme applicable pour la délivrance de cette autorisation est celle des «motifs raisonnables de croire», soit une norme plus sévère que celle des «motifs raisonnables de soupçonner». [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:00 pm
’ Graves had five dogs of his own. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:57 am
On the other side, the few academics who refuse to be co-opted into the Title IX army do so at grave personal risk. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:37 am
Plains Pipeline, L.P. et al. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:37 am
Plains Pipeline, L.P. et al. v. [read post]
