Search for: "Hare v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 79
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm by vforberger
The majority’s misinterpretation of the exemption renders the statute in violation of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution as well as the Wisconsin Constitution. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 10:34 am by Dennis Crouch
That would be an unfortunately crabbed view of the Conference’s statutory authority to “prescribe general rules of practice and procedure . . . in the United States district courts. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
On January 1, 2024, Peter Pan will finally enter the public domain in the United States—but not in Barrie’s native United Kingdom. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 1:40 am by centerforartlaw
Pareda (https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/seller-forged-basquiats-and-harings-arrested-fraud-charges) United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 12:49 pm by centerforartlaw
Select Additional Sources Shortland, Anja, Lost Art: The Art Loss Register Casebook Vol I (2021) at page 9 ↑ ibid, at page 39 ↑ Cases discussed in this chapter by Shortland: United States of America v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  The best ones outside of the United States are in Dubai and Amsterdam. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts Judgement was given in the appeal of A v Burke and Hare UKEATS/0020/20/DT. [read post]
4 May 2020, 9:42 am by James J. La Rocca
The NLRA is a federal law that governs labor relations for most private sector employers in the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:21 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
As you may be aware, the VWP allows citizens or nationals of certain participating countries the ability to travel to the United States for a temporary period of 90 days or less without having to obtain a United States visa. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 6:55 am by Richard Hunt
Turning to the pleadings, the Court found that the plaintiff had failed to plead a class whose members had claims united by common questions of law and fact – the “commonality” requirement. [read post]