Search for: "Harper v. Show et al" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:50 pm by Josh H. Escovedo
Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Gorsuch, released its decision in NCAA v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm by Chuck Cosson
“Tool Without A Handle:  Spirituality, Virtue, and Technology Ethics” "If one loves righteousness, whose works are virtues,She teaches moderation and prudence, righteousness and fortitude, and nothing in life is more useful than these. [read post]
10 May 2020, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Live streaming providers as ‘online content sharing service providers’ und… https://t.co/gzsXkBVw5r 2020-05-08 Fair dealing defence made out for documentary, Wiseau Studio, LLC et al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
It estimated that this piracy costs Canadian and US broadcasters and other communication service providers up to five billion dollars a year.[13] Studies on site blocking have not only shown that they reduce traffic to blocked web sites, they also show that piracy hurts sales of legitimate content and services by showing that website blocking increases access to content through legitimate services. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 9:27 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Mike, it's not solo inventors or patent trolls that are flooding the USPTO with incremental concepts; it's IBM, Microsoft, Cisco, Apple, et al. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm by Gordon Firemark
Conrad Murray was hired to care for MJ and make sure he was present and alert for preparations MJ died after Murray administered lethal dose of anesthetic propofol (which was intended to help MJ sleep) Civil Suit (Katherine Jackson et al v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 2:41 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Guergis v Novak et al Statement of Claim [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
Another key to interpreting a statute is that when Congress includes language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same law, it is presumed that Congress intentionally excluded the language.23 The presumptively intentional omission of “proximate result” from the first five subsections suggests that Congress did not want to burden victims of child abuse images with a requirement that they show a proximate cause for these losses. [read post]