Search for: "Hart v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
In September 2000, the FDA’s Office of Post-Marketing Drug Risk Assessment released the results, with its own interpretation and conclusion that dramatically exceeded the HSP authors’ own interpretation.[8] The FDA’s Non-Prescription Drug Advisory Committee then voted, on October 19, 2000, to recommend that PPA be reclassified as “unsafe. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
The Applicant is a police officer who filed a defamation claim against the defendant for statements she made on social media about his conduct at a “Free Palestine” rally, which he claims are untrue. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 25 October 2022, the appeal against the summary judgment granted in favour of the respondent that dismissed the appellant’s defamation claim in ZOLLO v THE COMMISSIONER FOR CONSUMER AFFAIRS [2022] SADC 126 was dismissed. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am by Robert B. Milligan
On appeal, defendants argued that the plaintiff’s description of its trade secrets was inadequate because it did not state which secrets it claimed that the defendant had misappropriated. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The injunction does not remove the rights of the defendants to assemble and express their opposition to the fossil fuel industry. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
IPSO 07847-21 Brooks v bournemouthecho.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 3 Harassment (2019), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement – 11905-21 Lal v derbytelegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation New Issued Cases Six defamation (libel and slander) claims and one harassment claim were filed on the Media and Communications List last week. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am by Patti Waller
It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food handling or cooking.[43] Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome E. coli O157:H7 infections can lead to a severe, life-threatening complication called hemolytic uremic syndrome (“HUS”).[44] HUS accounts for the majority of the acute and chronic illness and death caused by the bacteria.[45]… [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
On 23 May 2018 there was an assessment of damages in the IPEC before District Judge Hart in the case of Robert Grahn T/A Euroluftbilde.De v Express Newspapers On 24 May 2018, Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Sube v News Group Newspapers [2018] EWHC 1234 (QB). [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am by Lorelie S. Masters
  For example, the New York Insurance Law specifically provides that evidence relating to other “similarly situated” policyholders is relevant to the issue of the materiality of an alleged misrepresentation in the policy application.5 As exemplified by the New York Court of Appeals in Belt Painting v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am by Lorelie S. Masters and Paul T. Moura
  For example, the New York Insurance Law specifically provides that evidence relating to other “similarly situated” policyholders is relevant to the issue of the materiality of an alleged misrepresentation in the policy application.5 As exemplified by the New York Court of Appeals in Belt Painting v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
  As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:05 am by Jeffrey May
Court of Appeals in Philadelphia ordered a federal district court to enter a preliminary injunction that would prohibit the two hospital systems from taking any steps to consummate the proposed deal, pending the completion of the FTC’s administrative trial on the merits of its underlying antitrust claims. [read post]