Search for: "Hastings v. Department of Corrections"
Results 1 - 20
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Is it the Department of Justice only? [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
EPA and Biden v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court observed in Forsyth County v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
These allegations are consistent with the Department of Justice’s court filings in Cohen’s federal criminal case. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
Interim findings of an independent analysis commissioned by the BSC department “suggest that there may be significant gaps were the Bill to proceed in its current form. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm
[vi]The release does not offer any substantive explanation for why such haste is necessary. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am
Gutting his internal counsel department. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am
He said that the Government would introduce an early dismissal procedure and a new costs protection regime but warned against legislating in haste. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
Casey, now overruled by Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Department of Justice) prior to implementing changes in voting systems and rules, even systems and rules for state and local (as distinguished from congressional or presidential) elections. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
IPSO 09738-21 Woodcock v Huddersfield Daily Examiner, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 09739-21 Woodcock v mirror.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigatio 09740-21 Woodcock v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 09741-21 Woodcock v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 09742-21… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 2:56 am
On Wednesday 15th June, the Court will hand down three judgments, starting at 09:45 in Courtroom One: Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica) [2022] UKSC 15 This is an immigration matter in which the court will consider the reasonable expectation to stay in Jamaica and any significant obstacles, and the correct tests to be applied. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (2015) and Rucho v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 3:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 08/06/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October … [read post]
23 May 2022, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 25/5/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October … [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:55 am
Department of Health and Human Service, a case that reached the court via the emergency docket (or "shadow docket). [read post]
