Search for: "Hastings v. Judicial Conference of US" Results 1 - 20 of 71
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
However, in its haste to overturn Moelis, the DSBA may have taken a sledgehammer to the DGCL where a scalpel was more prudent. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
However, in its haste to overturn Moelis, the DSBA may have taken a sledgehammer to the DGCL where a scalpel was more prudent. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court didn’t address and debunk ISL on the merits (as it later did last summer in Moore v Harper), the Court dismissed Texas’s filing on the ground that Texas lacked standing under Article III because “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Neal’s Lessee), that whether state law comes from statutes or judicial rulings is no concern of the federal government (Erie), and that states have broad power under the Tenth Amendment (subject, of course, to republican government principles) to blend legislative and judicial roles (Calder v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
(For more evidence of lawyerly shabbiness in earlier stages of Moore v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
There was a European Anti-SLAPP Conference in Strasbourg last week. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Barry Winograd
At a recent judicial conference, he posed the issue in stark terms: “If the court doesn’t retain its legitimate function of interpreting the constitution, I’m not sure who would take up that mantle. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]