Search for: "Hastings v. Judicial Conference of United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
The Eleventh Amendment states: The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.The language of this Amendment is a bit turgid and technical. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:09 am
When the United States is not a party, the solicitor general does occasionally file amicus briefs on behalf of the United States in cases involving rule interpretation. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:10 am
In her research paper, Professor Mullenix discusses the impact of the United States Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Atlantic Marine. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
There is an established right under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution which prohibits the execution of one who is insane, as set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Ford v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
There is an established right under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution which prohibits the execution of one who is insane, as set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Ford v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:40 am
Chemerisnky – United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
In New York, prior to 2012, the process of drawing district lines was entirely within the purview of the legislature,[FN1]subject to state and federal constitutional restraint and federal voting laws, as well as judicial review. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
In New York, prior to 2012, the process of drawing district lines was entirely within the purview of the legislature,[FN1]subject to state and federal constitutional restraint and federal voting laws, as well as judicial review. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances --Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
The case since has settled.Computer Fraud and Abuse ActThe most significant CFAA case of the past several years has been United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
[And] [n]otable state judicial review under state constitutions in fact predated the Philadelphia Convention, Federalist No. 78, and Marbury v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:15 pm
From Richard v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
United States, a case somewhat similar to Blagojevich’s. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:04 am
I have done so only briskly, and I have surely missed things in my haste. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
A decision by a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit late last month concerning Section 2 of the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), in Arkansas State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The federal law was clearly (indeed obviously) unconstitutional under Johnson, and the Supreme Court so held in 1990 in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
(And that judicial review under state constitutions predated the federal Constitution.) [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
By contrast, the Judicial Conference of the United States, which is principally responsible for making policies for the administration of federal courts, has generally moved in the opposite direction from the states. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
And if (as AIRC held) “Legislature” in Article I’s Election Clause can include the people of a State acting directly, so too must “Legislature” in Article II’s provision conferring power on state legislatures to direct the manner of picking presidential electors.Another Case About Democracy: Shelby County v. [read post]
