Search for: "Heard v. Frye" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2023, 4:50 pm by Russell Knight
City of Chicago, 771 NE 2d 1030 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 4th Div. 2002 “Illinois law is unequivocal: the exclusive test for the admission of expert testimony is governed by the standard first expressed in Frye v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 11:30 am by Russell Knight
Something someone experienced first-hand is more reliable than something they merely heard about second-hand (hearsay). [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 23 October 2020 Nicklin J heard the trial of a preliminary issue in the case of Junejo v New Vision TV Ltd. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:32 am by Anthony Gaughan
On Monday I wrote about the legal legacy of Erie Railroad Company v Tompkins. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 2:03 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Reasoning by analogy to the court’s decision in People v LeGrand, which dealt with expert testimony on eyewitness identification, defense counsel argued that the judge should at a minimum hold a Frye hearing on the admissibility of Dr. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 6:57 pm by Donald Thompson
 One document that was generated but was out of my plan was “Defendant’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Frye-Mack Hearing” in State of Minnesota v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Corbitt… In State v. [read post]