Search for: "Hicks v. Thomas" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
Goodwin, Society Trustee, interviews Paul DeForest Hicks. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
In the McGahn oral argument, Judge Thomas Griffith, an appointee of George W. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Marty Lederman
Not surprisingly, there are already a slew of reactions to the Court's landmark decision on Friday in Carpenter v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
Roskelley, Hicks & Walt, Las Vegas, NV, for the defendants-appellees. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:38 am by Evan Lee
”  This rhetorical question — cited prominently in Rosales-Mireles’ brief — was originally posed by Justice Neil Gorsuch in his concurring opinion in Hicks v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 7:23 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 9:06 am by William Ford, Matthew Kahn
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The Reyelts Opinion In addition to Texas Insurance Code chapter 4102, the legal landscape forming the basis of the Keys' motion for class certification includes a federal court case, Reyelts v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The Reyelts Opinion In addition to Texas Insurance Code chapter 4102, the legal landscape forming the basis of the Keys' motion for class certification includes a federal court case, Reyelts v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 6:56 pm by Amy Howe
” Chief Justice John Roberts dissented from the court’s decision in Hicks, joined by Thomas. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
” Supreme Court short-lister Judge Thomas Hardiman dissented. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:20 am by ELLIOT GOLD, SERGEANTS' INN CHAMBERS
The Supreme Court in the case of R (Hicks) v Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police [2017] UKSC 9 gives some assistance to the police where they seek to arrest persons in light of an imminent breach of the peace and provides a simpler statement of the law than did the Court of Appeal. [read post]