Search for: "Hill v. Patterson" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2023, 6:56 am by Jeff Welty
Want to work in beautiful Chapel Hill? [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:44 am by Emma Snell
Scott Patterson and Alexa Corse report for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:29 am by Emma Snell
Ellen Mitchell reports for The Hill. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:26 am by Emma Snell
Caroline Vakil reports for The Hill. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm by Vercammen Law
 Trust and Estate Implications Involving Potentially Incapacitated PersonsS.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC (A-87-18) (081916) Argued November 6, 2019 -- Decided March 9, 2020ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.Only when, through proper legal procedures, a court determines that a litigant lacks the mental capacity to govern her affairs may the litigant be deprived of the right to decide the destiny of her lawsuit. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed at The Hill, A. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The Court summarized the law on vested rights in New York as follows: " a vested right can be acquired when, pursuant to a legally issued permit, the landowner demonstrates a commitment to the purpose for which the permit was granted by effecting substantial changes and incurring substantial expenses to further the development" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d 41, 47; see Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d 542, 544; Matter of Lefrak Forest… [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The Court summarized the law on vested rights in New York as follows: " a vested right can be acquired when, pursuant to a legally issued permit, the landowner demonstrates a commitment to the purpose for which the permit was granted by effecting substantial changes and incurring substantial expenses to further the development" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d 41, 47; see Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d 542, 544; Matter of Lefrak Forest… [read post]