Search for: "Hill v. Samples et al" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Fox Williams authors are Andrew Hill, Partner; Anisha Patel, Senior Associate; and Sam Tarrant and Olwen Mair, Associates. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm by Schachtman
Ahmed-Saucedo’s dismissal of the importance of a dose-response relationship, another Hill factor, as unimportant sealed her fate. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
A 2019 epidemiological study has revealed that 9.2% of cattle and 18.2% of beef contain the pathogen.[2] Another recent study has estimated that the Gram-negative bacteria is present in up to 16% of North American cattle.[3] In a 2007 study by Stephens et al., Salmonella was isolated from all of the animals sampled, while Escherichia coli O157:H7 was only isolated from 42.5% of the animals.[4] Notably, 94% of oral cavity samples, 94% of hock samples, 88%… [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 26 conference)   CTIA-The Wireless Association, et al. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 3:40 pm by Schachtman
” Austin Bradford Hill, “The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am by Schachtman
Diamond, MD, et al., “Uncertain Effects of Rosiglitazone on the Risk for Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Death,” 147 Ann. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:30 am by Ben Cheng
§ 7, violates the equal protection component of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment; and (2) whether the court below erred by inventing and applying to Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act a previously unknown standard of equal protection review.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (1st Cir.)Petition for certiorariAmicus brief of Capital Hill Prayer Foundation et al.Amicus brief of Indiana et al.Amicus brief of Eagle Forum Education & Legal… [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:14 am by Schachtman
  See id. at 10 n. 3 (citing Anders Grøntved, et al., “Television Viewing and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes, Cardiovascular Disease, and All-Cause Mortality, 305 J. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Jackson (1969) (being a sampling of his judicial opinions). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
  Bias and confounding must be considered, along with other Bradford Hill factors. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
One of these disputes involved reciprocal claims relating to sensor tools used to gather information and fluid samples from oil and gas wells. [read post]