Search for: "Hoar v. Hoar"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2023, 1:40 am
Simon Hoare, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (and, we learned, the Government’s Minister for Faith), replied. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 12:32 pm
The Holy Roman Emperor Maximillian I had just died, and his grandson Charles V was about to be crowed in Aachen as his successor. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
The most celebrated argument for why Brown v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:06 pm
George Edmunds and George Hoar) or were lawyers for Hayes arguing before the commission (Sen. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am
Today’s live blog team comprises Devina Shah, Jennifer Love, Siobhan Kahmann, Russell Hoare and another round-up of the day’s hearing from Dan Tench, Kenny Henderson, Siobhan Kahmann and Jess Foley, all from CMS. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am
"That quote is also interesting with a view to the recently-filed Intel and Apple v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Observations on Geography while Waiting for G2/19 .IPR Carousel Dominic Hoar reports on AIPPI Event Report: Actavis v ICOS Supreme Court Rapid Response. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 2:56 am
In Actavis v Lilly, Lord Neuberger was keen to follow Germany, which was subsequently watered down in Warner Lambert and, now, more so. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 2:49 am
Among the significant opinions he authored was United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 12:44 pm
And in 1926, Supreme Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft said in Myers v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:50 pm
Emily Bowen, Ohio State Univ. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:15 am
And in 1926, Supreme Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft said in Myers v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:21 am
A similar conclusion was reached in March of last year by the High Court in a claim brought by a number of firms of solicitors (R (Ben Hoare Bell and Ors) v Lord Chancellor [2015] EWHC 523 (Admin)) who contended that regulations made under LASPO introducing the “no permission, no fee” arrangement in applications for judicial review were significantly outwith the purpose of LASPO since their application in some situations could not in any sense incentivise providers to a… [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 2:49 pm
Hoar, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:53 pm
Ben Hoare Bell Solicitors & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v The Lord Chancellor [2015] EWHC 523 (Admin) The legal aid funding regulations for judicial reviews, in effect from April 2014, were the subject of this judicial review. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 11:39 am
In today’s case (Blaikie v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am
On 5 July 2012 Tugendhat J gave judgment in the case of Mayer v Hoar ([2012] EWHC1805 (QB)), which was heard on 29 June 2012. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:29 am
(Rev 3) [2012] EWCA Crim 1456 (04 July 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Secretary of State for Home Department v AM [2012] EWHC 1854 (Admin) (06 July 2012) The College of Naturopathic Medicine Ltd (CNM), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) [2012] EWHC 1851 (Admin) (05 July 2012) FGP v Serco Plc & Anor [2012] EWHC 1804 (Admin) (05 July 2012) High Court (Commercial Court) Sibir Energy Ltd v Tchigirinski & Ors… [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
On 29 June 2012, Tugendhat J heard an application to strike out a libel claim in Mayer v Hoar. [read post]
