Search for: "Holmes v. Powell"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
In Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation v Public Service Commission of New York 447 US 557, 566 (1980) Powell J (for the Court) held that, in such cases, a four-part analysis has developed: At the outset, we must determine whether the expression is protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
Jefferson Powell, Constitutional Conscience (Chicago, 2008) Jeremy A Rabkin, Law Without Nations? [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 10:32 am
” Ramos v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Powell on race come to mind, did so on grounds that as long as Supreme Court majorities were bent on protecting individual rights, the justices might as well protect the “right” rights. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm
Jefferson Powell, Constitutional Conscience (Chicago, 2008) Jeremy A Rabkin, Law Without Nations? [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am
The major problem with such an idea is that it guarantees that we will no longer get anyone on the Court who has had a truly significant non-judicial career as an elected public official or even private lawyer (such as Lewis Powell). [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Is a “republican” society organized around the quest for a common good that will be sought by suitably socialized citizens destined to become a distinctly more “liberal” order that accepts the priority of individual interests and the psychology associated with self-seeking (ultimately defined so memorably by Oliver Wendell Holmes in terms of his completely egoistic “bad man” concerned only with maximizing individual utilities)? [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am
Jefferson Powell, Constitutional Conscience (Chicago, 2008) Jeremy A Rabkin, Law Without Nations? [read post]
12 May 2020, 10:11 am
Washington and Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:13 am
In Nixon v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
S. 221(1986) (POWELL, J., dissenting) (citing Care v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 10:33 am
The so-called Bill of Rights had no effective legal presence prior to the 1940s, and Justice Holmes, I believe in Buck v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Supp. 1217, es parcialmente confirmado y parcialmente revocado.BLACKMUN, J., emitió la opinión de la Corte, en la que se unieron BURGER, CJ, y DOUGLAS, BRENNAN, STEWART, MARSHALL y POWELL, JJ. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:16 am
In Walton v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Powell v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm
” Gillman has in mind leading figures like Justices Holmes, Brandeis, and Cardozo. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 1:30 pm
Justice Holmes famously wrote in 1919 in his dissent inAbrams v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
” Powell v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:44 pm
El célebre e ilustre Oliver Wendell Holmes dijo allí: "Hemos visto más de una vez que el bienestar público puede reclamar la vida de los mejores ciudadanos. [read post]
