Search for: "Hunter v. McDonald" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2023, 1:11 pm by Michael Oykhman
Examples of acts which have, in the past, met the actus reus standard for a section 86 offence include: Storing a firearm in a glovebox (see: R v Patrick, 2007 CanLII 7579 (ONSC)) Storing a firearm in a dresser (see: R v McDonald, 2016 BCSC 1648 (CanLII)) Storing a firearm by a furnace (see: R v Roussel, 2014 ABQB 202 (CanLII)) The Guilty Mind (Mens Rea) The mens rea or the guilty mind speaks to the accused’s degree of intent during the argued commission of… [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:30 am by Philip Zelikow
  The judge, Gabrielle McDonald, granted our request and in 1982 shut down the training activities in Vietnamese Fishermen’s Ass’n v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm by David Kopel
(Andrews, which struck down a ban on handgun carrying, was cited in Heller and McDonald. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
What progress has been made on gun law reform in state legislatures this year? [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am by David Cruz
  Yet of the more “conservative” Justices who ruled in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Nat
  The proposed constitutional amendment “Prop 12” would, in the words of Craig McDonald, director of Texans for Public Justice, “take power away from communities, judges and juries and give the Texas Legislature the absolute unfettered power to grant special interest groups special protections from the harm they might cause in the future and dismantle the checks and balances system that’s been the backbone of our government. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am by Rob Robinson
§ 1920 (PDF) t.co/f6HHAi9a (Latham & Watkins) No Resolution Reached in Pippins v. [read post]