Search for: "ICON HEALTH & FITNESS, INC. v. OCTANE FITNESS, LLC " Results 1 - 20 of 125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2023, 9:00 am by Dennis Crouch
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 572 U.S. 545 (2014). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:40 am by Dennis Crouch
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 572 U.S. 545 (2014); Highmark Inc. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 10:53 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 572 U.S. 545 (2014), which was a patent case, should guide district courts when facing attorney fee applications under the Lanham Act. [read post]
7 May 2019, 9:52 pm by Patent Docs
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. and Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:15 pm by Christine Armellino
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., empowering district courts to award attorneys’ fees in those patent case that “stand out from others. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:15 pm by Christine Armellino
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., empowering district courts to award attorneys’ fees in those patent case that “stand out from others. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The statute provides that the court may award attorneys’ fees to the prevailing party “in exceptional cases” (see Octane Fitness, LLC v Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., __ US __, __, 134 S Ct 1749, 1756 [2014]). [read post]