Search for: "IN RE A CARR MINOR" Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2023, 2:01 pm by Cory Carlson
Let's Start With Some Semantics My friend and colleague Jeffrey Carr is married to a wonderful Belarusian-turned-freedom-loving American named Tanya. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
On 18 May 2023 there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Carr v Carr. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm by Josh Blackman
Chicago, concerning the Privileges or Immunities Clause Antonin Scalia: And if the answer is no, why are you asking us to overrule 150, 140 years of prior law, when—when you can reach your result under substantive due—I mean, you know, unless you're bucking for a—a place on some law school faculty– [Laughter] Alan Gura: –No. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 4:39 am by INFORRM
There were certainly a few liberal or left voices that were unsupportive – for example, Germaine Greer, John le Carré and John Berger – but no paper has offered a shred of proof that any specific person or organisation that supported Rushdie in 1989 and thereafter is now engaging in calling for the censorship of those with whom they disagree. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Critics argue those changes will make it harder for many Democratic-leaning groups, including minority communities, to cast a ballot. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 7:47 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Federal Communications Commission With Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel elevated to Acting Chair of the Commission, the FCC is deadlocked with a 2-2 tie (Ds Rosenworcel and Geoffrey Starks; Rs Brendan Carr and Nathan Simington). [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:24 am by Victoria Gallegos
The panel will feature Brendan Carr, commissioner of the FCC; Nury Turkel, commissioner of the U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 9:58 am by Joel A. Webber
A minority of lawyers oppose the prevailing model, and a few businesses are actively demanding efficiency and measurable value in their law functions. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:24 am by Ron Friedmann
But with minor exceptions, law firms, even in the US, have not tapped significant outside capital. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 9:18 am by Steve Lubet
Re-reading the essay, however, has caused me to re-think some of my own views about the piece (posted here) with, I hope, a little more nuance. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
| Freedom of expression transcends morality in US trademark registration | Red Bull sues rival F1 sponsor Rich Energy for trade mark infringement | The copyright question that no one wanted: the rights of immigrant minors in their drawings in connection with their detention along the U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 2:43 pm by Ilya Somin
  And to take a very recent case, any re-invigoration of the nondelegation doctrine, as suggested by Gundy v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]