Search for: "IN RE DEPENDENCY AS TO J.A." Results 1 - 20 of 71
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2023, 1:20 pm by Patricia Hughes
Following Working Families I, the Ontario legislature had re-enacted the legislation with the inclusion of section 33 of the Charter, prompting the challenge under section 3. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
T., 2022 BCCA 345 (40447) Issues re alleged sexual assault after consensual foreplay. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
 A majority of the Ontario Court of Appeal (MacPherson J.A. dissenting) overturned this verdict and ordered a new trial. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Rather, we agree with Hoegg J.A., in dissent, that ineffective assistance of counsel was not made out. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 2:52 pm by Patricia Hughes
In this sense, I argue, the bona fides principle is a fundamental element of the rule of law that could serve to invalidate government action, depending on various factors which I discuss below, including the relevance of other principles and rules. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Constitutionality Re Parole IneligibilityAttorney General of Québec and Her Majesty the Queen v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
” Criminal Law: Sexual Offences re a MinorR. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Since then, there is this example of critically important mobile phone tower tracking evidence that was the basis of a conviction for second degree murder at a first trial, later found to be faulty before the re-trial: R. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
This is a short summary of the full text of this article, which has the same title, and which was posted on the SSRN, March 25, 2019, pdf.; 62 pages The fact that lawyers lack the knowledge to challenge the reliability of technical sources of frequently used kinds of evidence, and the tolerating of its impact upon the ability to “do justice,” is due to the under-performance of a number of institutions within the justice system. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:13 pm by Patricia Hughes
[SCJ, paras. 232-234] He recognized that sexual harassment could ground damages for intentional infliction of mental distress, but citing Perell J.A. in High Parklane Consulting Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
As Blair J.A. observed: It is not the role of this court to determine whether, as a matter of policy, the operations of the respondents serve the public interest. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 7:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In doing so, itafforded the statements weight depending on the contextsin which they were made and their relevance to its analysis.See J.A. 14–23. [read post]