Search for: "INTERNATIONAL CUSTOM PRODUCTS V US" Results 1 - 20 of 2,177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Dubbed ‘finfluencers,’ the defendants are accused of providing unofficial advice on buying and selling contracts for high-risk derivative products, which reportedly result in 80% of customers losing their investment. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:39 am by Eric Goldman
Colibri * Competitive Keyword Ad Lawsuit Fails…Despite 236 Potentially Confused Customers–Lerner & Rowe v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
PA’s studies are widely used because others use and seemingly take heed o [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 4:20 am by Jonathan Santman (Brinkhof)
Waiting until a judgment on the merits will lead to customers stocking up on the infringing products en masse before a judgment on the merits can be issued. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 1:15 pm by Sofya Asatryan
Whether TT is entitled to reasonable royalties from IBG because it made the accused product in the United States even though they were used by customers overseas. [read post]
29 May 2024, 5:52 am by Greg Lambert
He sees Vincent AI as a secure bridge between generative AI and a firm’s internal work product, enabling them to leverage their knowledge assets without the need for expensive, in-house foundation models. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Although AI service providers largely do not indemnify users from copyright claims related to their free AI services,35 some AI vendors offer enterprise and developer customers limited indemnity protections that are often delineated in terms of use for specific AI products.36 Such terms may narrow the scope of indemnities with broad exclusions. [read post]
This term stated that customers must “tell us if anything changes while you’re insured with us” (the Notification Clause) (our emphasis) and was included within Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs) issued with approximately 1,377,900 contracts for home and contents insurance policies. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm by Larry
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
MI, a US-based company, manufactures products in the US which support the in situ detection of nucleic acids using various probes. [read post]
The actual scope of the representations and warranties will vary depending on what AI technology or tool is used by the company and for what purposes such as customer facing in products or for internal purposes. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:30 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
The two distributors owned the rights in certain parts of Connecticut to distribute the company’s products to store accounts and their own customers. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
According to Harper’s Bazaar, customers who want to buy a Birkin must have an extensive history of purchasing goods from the brand in order to even be offered the opportunity to purchase one of the hard-to-get bags. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
In alleging this purported market, the FTC relies heavily on the parties’ ordinary course business documents, including those that describe “accessible luxury” as a distinct handbag product with a distinct customer base in contrast with the “mass-market” and “true luxury” segments of the handbag industry. [read post]