Search for: "In Matter of Special 1977 Grand Jury"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
Constitution provides members of Congress immunity from testifying before a grand jury about their “legislative activities. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Pointing to the landmark 1977 case that forced disclosure of the Nixon tapes, the committee contends Trump has only personal disagreement with the accurate application of precedent by the lower courts. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
The Statement of Facts may look like a grand jury report, but it’s [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
The last to be charged, in July, was a conservator for his alleged role in Subhash Kapoor’s smuggling ring.Steinhardt, nevertheless, no longer will be able to purchase or sell archaeological material, a novel condition that prosecutors imposed to resolve the case of “IN THE MATTER OF A GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION INTO A PRIVATE NEW YORK ANTIQUITIES COLLECTOR. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
The last to be charged, in July, was a conservator for his alleged role in Subhash Kapoor’s smuggling ring.Steinhardt, nevertheless, no longer will be able to purchase or sell archaeological material, a novel condition that prosecutors imposed to resolve the case of “IN THE MATTER OF A GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION INTO A PRIVATE NEW YORK ANTIQUITIES COLLECTOR. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 8:41 am
Solem (D.N.D. 1977), which struck down a much broader, content-based speech restriction.) [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[32] The parties’ intentions are considered a matter of law, and intent is referred to the trier of fact only if a court determines that the document is ambiguous as a matter of law.[33] Under the objective standard, statements of the parties’ intentions carry the greatest weight.[34] In Teachers Ins. and Annuity Ass’n of America v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:24 pm
Solem (D.N.D. 1977), which struck down a much broader, content-based speech restriction.) [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
Furthermore, there is the matter of physicians reading the same X-ray in two, inconsistent ways. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am
Espy concerns a grand jury subpoena for White House documents that arose out of a criminal investigation into former Secretary of Agriculture Mike Espy. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
Background On 7 July 2015, Defendant was indicted by a Cabarrus County Grand Jury on four counts of felony embezzlement. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
In 1977, the House adopted a rule change that allowed individual committees to, if they wished, delegate the power to issue subpoenas to the chairman alone, without the need to consult the full committee. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:05 am
In court, Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski said that the grand jury had materials to submit to the judge: an indictment and a sealed report. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:39 pm
A number of the defendants are also alleged to have made a false statement to the FBI and / or obstructed justice by producing false and fictitious records to a Federal Grand Jury. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am
Disclosure of Grand Jury Proceedings Unless certain enumerated exceptions apply, no one involved in the grand jury session except the witness may “disclose… matters occurring before the grand jury. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 8:21 am
(That report was eventually released in 1977, after Jaworski’s departure.) [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
As a threshold matter, we must address whether Blake and Moore have standing to make this challenge. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:12 pm
Attorney for the District of Columbia to bring the matter before a grand jury and to prosecute. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
The change was precipitated by a grand jury subpoena issued to President Nixon at the request of the special prosecutor seeking the production of certain tapes, transcripts, and memoranda relating to certain meetings held by Nixon. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
It is a fact well known to certain Episcopalians—both those who have left the Episcopal Church (USA) and those who have remained—that ECUSA and its dioceses have followed a pattern of suing any church that chooses to leave for another Anglican jurisdiction. [read post]
