Search for: "In RE MARRIAGE OF HARMS v. Harms" Results 1 - 20 of 424
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
In the wake of the announced boycott against Columbia University, I posed several questions to Judge Matthew Solomson of the U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, recognition of the right to same-sex marriage not only does not harm people who oppose same-sex marriage; it affirmatively benefits them.Expanding the circle of right-holders in other ways can also benefit existing right-holders who might think of themselves as harmed by that expansion. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Joiner had can cause small-cell lung cancer.[13] Perhaps the most egregious lapses in scholarship occur when Ranges, a newly minted scientist, and her co-author, a full professor of law, write: “For example, Bendectin, an antinausea medication prescribed to pregnant women, caused a slew of birth defects (hence its nickname ‘The Second Thalidomide’).49”[14] I had to re-read this sentence many times to make sure I was not hallucinating. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
For the moment, the vision is one of constant and granular application of  fairness balancing between traditional conceptions of male-female categorization n sport and other social relations (eg marriage, military service, clothing rules, etc.) and emerging re-imagining of sex and gender in social relations and in the constitution of the individual. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 2:01 pm by Cory Carlson
The term common law is regularly used by members of the legal profession and lay persons alike. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
Which is not to say they’re unimportant – just a lot less captivating than the brain candy that came before. [read post]