Search for: "In Re: A.A.-1, and A.A.-2"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 1:33 pm
(Statement of ICC Prosecutor Karim A.A. [read post]
27 May 2023, 5:50 pm
(Ethics Council Recommendation p. 13).)The Council identified the following threats: (1) Dust generated by truck traffic; (2) vibration; (3) visitor impacts; (4) increased humidity (including those generated by Tonasa's activities and the activity of local farmers; (5) and the possibility of loss of undiscovered art. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
One such example is the third edition’s treatment of confidence intervals.[1] The “DNA Identification” chapter noted that the meaning of a confidence interval is subtle,[2] but I doubt that the authors, David Kaye and George Sensabaugh, actually found it subtle or difficult. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:32 pm
A.a. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 12:08 am
Droit : 1. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Pour la dernière semaine, les trois décisions en français les plus consultées ont été: 1. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 6:23 am
… Whereas, on February 28, 2022, the International Criminal Court stated it would open a formal investigation into Russia’s invasion of Ukraine; Whereas International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim A.A. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 11:01 am
Those are: (1) that you “suffered intentional discrimination because of” your sex, (2) that the discrimination was severe or pervasive, (3) that the discrimination harmed you, and (4) that the discrimination would harm a reasonable person in your position. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
"2. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
Any attempt to characterize such a pattern of behavior as witness bribery must answer two basic questions: (1) are the medical witnesses being paid for expert services, rather than the content of their testimony; and (2) would awarding relief in this case establish a wide-ranging precedent under which legitimate experts would be chilled from rendering opinions and litigants’ access to the courts correspondingly restricted. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:37 am
’s constitutional due process rights for three reasons: (1) A.W. did not receive proper notice; (2) A.W. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
" We affirm.[1]I. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
" We affirm.[1]I. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
, 460 U.S. 1, 25 (1983)). [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
Mahmoud and Jackson argue that this conduct violates:• Section 1692e(2), which prohibits "false[ly] represent[ing] . . . the character, amount, or legal status of any debt";• Section 1692e(5), which prohibits "threat[ening] to take any action that cannot legally be taken";• Section 1692e(10), which prohibits "us[ing] . . . false representation[s] or deceptive means to collect or attempt to collect any debt or to obtain information concerning a… [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
In Daubert, the Court referenced five factors courts could use to determine the reliability of expert scientific testimony: (1) whether the expert’s theory or technique can be (and has been) tested; (2) whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review and publication; (3) the known or potential rate of error; (4) the existence and maintenance of standards controlling the technique’s operation; and (5) whether the technique has been generally… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:08 am
” [1] See In Re Fresh and Processed Potatoes Antitrust Litigation (D. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 10:02 pm
“GMO health risks,”[1] “The sweet lowdown: Exposing the unhealthy truth about sugar,”[2] “Is high-fructose corn syrup bad for you? [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 5:03 am
The appellate court observed that collateral estoppel requires four elements: (1) a prior action presents an identical issue; (2) the prior action actually litigated and adjudged that issue; (3) the judgment in that prior action necessarily required determination of the identical issue; and (4) the prior action featured full representation of the estopped party. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Example 2. [read post]
