Search for: "In Re: Asbestos Prods. Liability Litig."
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
The company began selling Johnson’s Baby Powder in 1894 and continued until the first successful actions were litigated beginning in 2013. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Although Selikoff died in 1992, his legacy lives on in the perpetual litigation machine that is run by the litigation industry and Selikoff’s juniors and imitators, who serve as testifying expert witnesses. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:39 am
See In re Viagra Prods. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
Asbestos litigation existed as workman’s compensation cases from the 1930s, and as occasional, isolated cases against manufacturers, from the late 1950s.[1] By 1970, federal regulation of asbestos, in both occupational and environmental settings, however, helped create a legal perpetual motion machine that is still running, half a century later. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
The important divide between regulatory practice and the litigation of causal claims in civil actions arises from the theoretical nature of the risk assessment enterprise. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
INTRODUCTION The new, third edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence was released to the public in September 2011, as a joint production of the National Academies of Science, and the Federal Judicial Center. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Marmor, eds., Product Liability Litigation: Current Law, Strategies and Best Practices (2nd ed. 2021). [8] Id. at § 8:5.1 Overview (referring to In re Silica Prods. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 10:11 am
See also In re Zofran (Ondansetron) Prod. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 10:11 am
See also In re Zofran (Ondansetron) Prod. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
The plaintiffs brought their suits for failure to warn, in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, but defendants removed to the federal asbestos multi-district litigation (MDL) court, invoking maritime jurisdiction. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:56 am
Lederle Laboratories, 97 N.J. 429, 479 A.2d 374 (1984). [13] In re Asbestos Litigation, 628 F.Supp. 774 (D.N.J.1986) (eight to six), aff’d sub nom. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am
Mar. 26, 2007); In re Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 48 Misc. 3d 460, 483-484 (Sup. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
Fraud GAF’s claims of frauds discussed[15] earlier focused on the claim that asbestos plaintiffs’ lawyers focused had committed [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am
Legislative Initiatives – The Asbestos Fairness in Compensation Act Over the years, Congress has considered various possible solutions to the problem of asbestos liability. [read post]
28 May 2019, 1:02 pm
But the product failed to live up to its express promise, the former troops say in the case of In re 3M Combat Arms Earplug Prods. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 1:24 pm
Litig. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 1:24 pm
Litig. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 1:24 pm
Litig. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Pl., Feb. 10, 2016) (Bernstein, J.). 2 Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, Asbestos: Selected Health Effects (2006). 3 In re Accutane Litig., ___ N.J. ___, ___ A.3d ___, 2018 WL 3636867 (2018); see “N.J. [read post]
