Search for: "In Re: D.c., Appellant"
Results 1 - 20
of 953
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
., 935 F. 2d 336, 342 (D.C. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
The D.C. [read post]
2 May 2024, 8:08 am
A divided panel of the D.C. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
Appellate court affirms district court. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:15 pm
Five States and D.C. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
Having three oral arguments before the United States Supreme Court in the same term is an accomplishment that only a handful of appellate lawyers can claim. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:30 pm
The first representative matter he lists on his firm's web site, for example, is a pro bono case that he and others at the firm litigated to "successfully secur[e] compassionate release for a D.C. inmate and military veteran, reuniting him with his family. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
The motion cataloged Trump’s long history of verbally attacking people involved in legal proceedings against him and his allies, offering examples from this case, the D.C. federal criminal prosecution, the Georgia state prosecution, the NY civil fraud case, and the prosecution of Roger Stone. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 12:30 pm
" We're appealing. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 3:09 pm
Justice Department official Michael Sherwin proudly declared in a television interview that “our office wanted to ensure that there was shock and awe … it worked because we saw through media posts that people were afraid to come back to D.C. because they’re, like, ‘If we go there, we’re gonna get charged. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:53 am
D.C. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm
Under the D.C. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:09 pm
” Quoting from a 1975 D.C. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 10:56 am
Ct. for D.C., 542 U.S. 367 (2004). [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm
And don't forget about the D.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:55 am
The trouble was Justice Jackson’s prior service on the D.C. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 10:44 am
FCC (D.C. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:40 am
” “Michael McCabe, a D.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 5:20 am
Louis and one in Washington, D.C. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
And although the Taft Court’s “level of disagreement in conference about certiorari cases was so great that it approximates the level of dissensus in the published cases of the contemporary Court,”[29] they produced more unanimous opinions for the relatively controversial cases that reached them through the certiorari docket than through the appellate one. [read post]
