Search for: "In Re: M., Mark, III"
Results 1 - 20
of 404
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
I'm not even sure they're reading from the same book. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 11:36 am
In the case styled In re Match Group Inc. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
Union Jack and European Union flag 2012 © Dave Kellam (CC BY-SA 2.0 Deed) Today marks a significant step towards the reconstruction of EU-UK Judicial Cooperation. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
” Mark Esper, Trump’s former defense secretary, has warned of “more … hyper-aggressive behavior” by Trump if he takes office, recounting when Trump asked if demonstrators gathering around the White House following the death of George Floyd could be shot. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
This dispute is one of those.The background to this case is well-summarized by SLATE Supreme Court reporters Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Again, we have come to bury Cuba's Caribbean Marxism, not to praise it (William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar Act III, scene II). [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
[Justice Scalia erred because there are no “Officers of the United States” appointed outside Article II, Section II.] [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 8:28 am
I’m going to focus on the court’s ruling on trespass to chattels doctrines. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:12 am
Together they describe the epistēmē (understood as "the strategic apparatus which permits of separating out from among all the statements which are possible those that will be acceptable" Foucault, Power/Knowledge (C. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
In re Abbott, 954 f.3d 772 (5th Cir. 2020), vacated, 141 S. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:39 am
Okay I’m making that up. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
However, by marked contrast with the executive officials in Free Enterprise Fund, that's because they're adjudicators, for whom insulation from executive supervision is designed to ensure fairness and impartiality. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:55 am
’ -- Jan M. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
At least I’ve got this to you before you sit down for your first Christmas lunch (CITMA on 1 December, I’m looking at you). 1. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 1:40 pm
Kind of wild/creative –I’m happy to discuss. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
UNH symposium: Section Two SmallPanel III - What’s Next? [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:35 am
I’m not bound by the rules of evidence, I’m not bound by the rules of court, and, with certain exceptions concerning children’s parenting arrangements, I’m only bound to consider the statutory and common law of a jurisdiction if the parties agree that I will apply that law in making my decision. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 2:34 pm
[iii] Dividend recaps are particularly useful to private equity firms in circumstances where the traditional methods for liquidating an investment—namely, M&A transactions and public offerings—are undesirable based on market conditions or other factors. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 3:00 am
Primarily, I’m engaged in claim strategy formulation and consultation, though occasionally, I’ll directly manage a claim. [read post]
