Search for: "In Re: Rochester v."
Results 1 - 20
of 118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2024, 3:00 am
NIH has since paused clinical trials for 3K3A-APC, a stroke drug sponsored by ZZ Biotech, a Houston-based company co-founded by Berislav V. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
When prisoners' art could potentially disclose military secrets, we're well through the looking glass. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
Re St. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am
And finally…II Per Julian Knowles J in Al-Masarir v Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2022] EWHC 2199 (QB) at [195]: “There are shades of Mandy Rice-Davies in this explanation — ‘they would say that, wouldn’t they? [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 4:30 am
See McMenemy v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 2:32 pm
See Univ. of Rochester v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 6:06 am
In Bartis v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 6:06 am
In Bartis v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:38 am
Last week, in Capizzi v Brown Chiari LLP, ___ AD3d ___, 2021 NY Slip Op 02956 [4th Dept May 7, 2021], a Rochester-based appeals court issued a decision affirming Justice Walker’s post-trial decision. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 12:20 pm
In Joffe v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 11:00 am
photo by V. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:50 am
See, e.g., Tzolis v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
