Search for: "In Re: Schering Plough Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 74
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
Risk assessments would seemingly be about assessing risks, but they are not. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
”).As to deference, Defendants cite a non-binding case, Schering-Plough Healthcare Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Schering-Plough Corp., California Supreme Court – existence of “presumption of reliance” in consumer fraud class actions·                     Caldwell v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
., 712 F.3d 51 (1st Cir. 2013), and Harden Manufacturing Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 10:27 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Schering-Plough Corp., 320 F.3d 1339, 1345, (Fed. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:36 pm by Michelle Yeary
  737 F.Supp.2d at 922-23 (citing In re ScheringPlough Corp. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 4:16 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Schering-Plough Corp., 320 F.3d 1339, 1345 (Fed.Cir. 2003). [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Although several Circuit Court decisions have used the so-called “scope of the patent test” when considering whether patent settlement agreements violate the antitrust laws, including the Eleventh Circuit in litigation involving the same K-DUR patent settlement agreement (see Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:17 pm by Bexis
  Moreover, given the Third Circuit’s intervening standing decision in In re Schering Plough Corp. [read post]