Search for: "In Re Abatement Environmental Resources, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2023, 2:57 am by admin
Focus: issues re. legal protection of horses. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
The complaint also contained a number of allegations to the effect that the defendant law firms had “used their considerable resources and power in an attempt to intimidate and deter GAF (and others) from exercising their constitutionally protected rights to petition Congress in support of legislation that would establish a fair and efficient administrative facility for resolving legitimate asbestos claims without the years of delay and wasteful fees and transaction costs that are… [read post]
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am by Dianne Saxe
Director, Ministry of the Environment   In the matter of appeals by Superior Fine Papers Inc. filed July 31, 2009, and by Cascades Inc. and Cascades Fine Papers Group Inc. filed August 7, 2009, for a Hearing before the Environmental Review Tribunal pursuant to section 140 of the Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 7:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
This would allow for speedy resolution of the maintenance issue, and prevent less well-off parties to divorce proceedings from falling into poverty during litigation, because they lack the resources to obtain a temporary maintenance order. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Environmental Protection Agency today announced that High Steel Structures, Inc. and its sister company High Concrete Group, LLC, have settled alleged violations of toxic chemical reporting requirements at their plants in Lancaster, Williamsport and Denver, Pa. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm by Steven M. Taber
Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has settled with TIMCO Engine Center Inc., Oscoda, Mich., for alleged violations of federal hazardous waste regulations. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am by Steven M. Taber
– EPA News Release, June 2, 2010 A Connecticut landlord has agreed to pay a penalty of $2,140 and perform a lead abatement project valued at $20,360 for allegedly violating federal lead-based paint disclosure requirements. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by smtaber
– EPA News Release, June 2, 2010 A Connecticut landlord has agreed to pay a penalty of $2,140 and perform a lead abatement project valued at $20,360 for allegedly violating federal lead-based paint disclosure requirements. [read post]