Search for: "In Re Bobbitt"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
I recommend Bobbitt, Dorf, and Strauss.Good luck in your new career!! [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 12:53 pm
Bobbitt’s “services to UK/US relations and public life. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
Frank Bowman recently published an essay in Lawfare that criticized arguments I made in an essay on the site. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 5:03 am
Nothing we can do about it until that president is up for re-election. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:48 am
The answer is not really, for a simple reason: In terms of what Philip Bobbitt has labeled the "modalities" of constitutional argument, Dershowitz is focusing relentlessly on one of them, "textualism," which relies for its strength on a naive approach to language that can be summarized by "what meaning of 'no' do you not understand? [read post]
The problematics of impeachment (I): The specific problems of Charles Black's take on the presidency
29 Jan 2020, 12:52 pm
But Black still believed, as does Bobbitt, that lawyers have some special insight into what it should take to displace a president. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:27 pm
Philip Bobbitt writes that the House should pause the impeachment process. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:13 pm
& Philip Bobbitt, Impeachment: A Handbook (2018). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:55 am
Bobbitt. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
The example of Gerald Ford, which Professor Tribe cites, might go the other way: Ford’s re-election is widely assumed to have been doomed by his pardon of Richard Nixon, hardly an incentive to future vice presidents contemplating a pardon for a humiliated and disdained former president. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:19 am
That’s what you’re paid for. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
Black, Jr. and Philip Bobbitt, forthcoming from Yale Press in September. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
” Philip Bobbitt raised this possibility in May of this year, and the facts that have since come to light add support to his conjecture. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
Impeachment—from the Latin impedicāre, to fetter, to entangle—is a process that the Framers did not merely export from the Brits but rescued from a withering vine. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 1:19 pm
We’re not sure, the Los Angeles Times notes. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:10 am
To avoid falling into the cognitive trap that Philip Bobbitt once dubbed Parmenides’ Fallacy—downplaying the costs of inaction—we must consider the likelihood and magnitude of damage leaks could have wrought had Comey chosen nondisclosure. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:40 am
The Justices asked for evidence of original understanding in the re-argument to Brown v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:27 am
The agents discovered that the magnetic strips on seven of the thirty-one cards had been re-encoded, i.e. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 7:59 am
One important task of this article is to rethink the familiar model of modalities of argument offered by Philip Bobbitt and Richard Fallon; and to offer a different version that better reflects the multiple ways that lawyers and judges actually use history in constitutional argument. [read post]
