Search for: "In Re Campbell (andrews B.)"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm
Lunney: points out that Campbell was just a remand. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Aside from Youngkin each are facing re-election fights this year. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:22 pm
Andrew Gilden: how much does ROP matter when it mostly seems to implement passing off? [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
The fact of the findings and the nature of the findings b. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 11:04 am
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction Evaluating the Federal R&D ax Credit Effectiveness of the R&D Tax Credit — Does the R&D Credit Increase R&D Spending? [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
”[15] By closing off inquiry into the limits of the DPA methodology, Judge Campbell managed to stumble into a huge analytical gap he blindly ignored, or was unaware of. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:38 am
Even if they could, that’s not a good idea b/c litigated cases don’t just resolve conflict b/t the parties; they’re supposed to tell us how to shape our future actions, and if it’s individualized CBA then there’s functionally no precedent because of changes in markets, individuals. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:36 pm
That draft guidance was deprecated by Mr Justice Hayden at the time in a case called Re J (A Minor) [2016] EWHC 2595 (Fam) : 37. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
This from Sandrine Giroud, Partner at LALIVE in Geneva:I am proud to announce that the Geneva Bar Association includes as of today the role of lawyers in the protection of human rights in its Professional Code of Conduct in accordance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:00 am
[More…] The Case for Federal Preemption of State Blue Sky Laws by Rutheford B. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 12:03 pm
There is a qualitative difference b/t the moment of creation and the moment of analysis, especially now in light of remix culture. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:49 am
John Campbell, R-Calif., Schrader, and Gary Peters, D-Mich. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:07 am
They’re unpublished works; the users are minors; there isn’t an optout; they’re using the whole thing; there’s a market harm (!). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 1:52 pm
As the 113th Congress convenes this week, we take a look back at the 112th Congress that just concluded and look forward to the challenges ahead. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Erichson Mass Tort Litigation Blog George Mason M David Bernstein Volokh Conspiracy George Mason M Ilya Somin Volokh Conspiracy George Mason M Josh Wright Truth on the Market George Mason M Todd Zywicki Volokh Conspiracy Georgetown F Rebecca Tushnet 43(B)log Georgetown M Lawrence B. [read post]
20 May 2012, 3:00 am
It also heard evidence from, among others Lord Wakeham, Alistair Campbell and former “Times” editor, Sir Harold Evans. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 11:31 am
Campbell has documented). [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
“ May 2011 BBC journalist Andrew Marr outed himself as a privacy claimant – in the Daily Mail. [read post]
