Search for: "In Re Medical Review Panel" Results 1 - 20 of 888
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Jul 17, 2023 | Is It Time to Re-Fuel Airline Regulation? [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:59 pm by Benson Varghese
The adjuster’s role is to assess the damage, review any injury claims, and determine the amount GEICO will pay. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:59 pm by Benson Varghese
The adjuster’s role is to assess the damage, review any injury claims, and determine the amount GEICO will pay. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:59 pm by Benson Varghese
The adjuster’s role is to assess the damage, review any injury claims, and determine the amount GEICO will pay. [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:15 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
As such, the IMR reviewer concluded that the current request fell within the guideline criteria for EMG/NCS study and was, therefore, medically necessary. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
A brief review of two published monographs by Frederick L. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
He injected the medicine into Jackson’s buttocks.Five medical experts who reviewed the case for AP said Jackson’s behavior did not appear to be dangerous enough to justify the intervention. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In an article for the Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, Jolynn Dellinger, a Senior Lecturing Fellow at Duke Law, and Stephanie K. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and… [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Such “further study” decisions by the Board could not operate so as to toll the 60 days allowed for review. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The initial tests of the newly articulated standard for admissibility of opinion testimony in silicone litigation did not go well.[3]  Peer review, which was absent in the re-analyses relied upon in the Bendectin litigation, was superficially present in the studies relied upon in the silicone litigation. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am by David Pocklington
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during March 2024 The ten consistory court judgments were circulated in March included: Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials Other This review also reviews: CDM Decisions and Safeguarding; Reports from the Independent Reviewer; Privy Council Business; Other legal issues; Visitations; CFCE Determinations; and Links to other posts relating to… [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” These warnings “shall comprise the top 50 percent of the front and rear panels of the package” of cigarettes and “at least 20 percent of the area of [any] advertisement .... [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 1:27 pm by John Ross
Dissent: Orders denying immunity in other contexts are reviewable before final judgment; this should be, too. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:46 pm
Classification rules for high-risk AI systems (Art. 6) High risk AI systems are those: used as a safety component or a product covered by EU laws in Annex II AND required to undergo a third-party conformity assessment under those Annex II laws; ORthose under Annex III use cases (below), except if: the AI system performs a narrow procedural task;improves the result of a previously completed human activity;detects decision-making patterns or deviations from prior decision-making patterns and is… [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  Much like medical jargon or terms for any other area of specialized knowledge, if a person hasn’t had reason to encounter a legal term before, they wouldn’t have reason to know what the various words and phrases mean. [read post]