Search for: "In Re Stickler" Results 1 - 20 of 144
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2024, 9:03 am by Dennis Crouch
In the first case, In re Honeywell Int’l Inc., Honeywell was sued for patent infringement in the Western District of Texas. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:52 am by Samuel Bray
Chapter 1 offers a kind of microcosm of the revisions in Ames, Chafee, and Re on Remedies. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
We can think of the ACCA as a kind of "four strikes and you're out" rule. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 3:15 am by Liz Dunshee
This MoFo memo says that case is part of a broader trend of companies being sticklers for compliance with “advance notice” provisions. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 3:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
In other cases involving governmental immunity, the Court has taken a functional approach: If you're acting as a judge or a prosecutor in an administrative proceeding, for example, you're entitled to the absolute immunity accorded to judges and prosecutors, regardless of your job title. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:11 pm by Josh Blackman
Article II If Justice Barrett is the Court's Article III stickler, then Justice Kavanaugh is the  Article II wonk. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:00 pm by James Romoser
” To paraphrase Justice Elena Kagan, we’re all Thomists now. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 4:50 am by SHG
This might seem a bit judgey, but you’re either judged or you’re ignored. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 12:16 pm by Michael H Cohen
You've got some corporate practice of medicine concerns in states that have really sticklers about CPM and fee-splitting. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 9:43 am by Ling Li
He was anything but a stickler for norms or conventions in this discipline. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 6:00 am by Mitchell Dowden
They’re growing a lot of vegetables for the local restaurant too. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
Does the "childhood" part mean you're not really friends with them anymore? [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Stephen Lee
” Just yesterday, DHS announced that it would reassess the future of the DACA program, including re-rescinding the program. [read post]