Search for: "In re: Peer Review Action." Results 1 - 20 of 919
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2024, 2:38 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
It doesn’t have the right senior people working together as peers…. [read post]
There are many peer-reviewed studies by actual scientists who concluded field sobriety tests may only be accurate 30% to 60% of the time. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 3:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For what it's worth, I am on record as stating that student-edited journals have some virtues that peer-reviewed journals lack. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Jul 17, 2023 | Is It Time to Re-Fuel Airline Regulation? [read post]
2 May 2024, 3:04 pm by Richmond Cariaga
  Whether you’re seeking guidance on creating an inclusive workplace or navigating the challenges of language discrimination, we’re here to help. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
Humphreys Ch. clarified that no permission for such actions was granted, and if this was required, a further petition must be brought [10]. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 6:31 pm by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Are you still seeing everyone saying, wow, there’s a lot of potential here, but not a lot of action yet. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Jordan Furlong
Cayton’s review of the Law Society’s governance was completed in late 2021. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The FDA deferred action on a final monograph for PPA, and product marketing continued. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The defendants unsuccessfully argued that the teacher’s $40 million tort action was barred by the exclusive remedy provisions of the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am by David Pocklington
With regard to the retrospective faculties/illegal actions, Humphreys Ch. said: [96]. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 9:15 am by James W. Ward
Employers should review their security procedures, travel time/requirements, and meal and rest break policies to ensure they’re compliant and consult their legal counsel with any specific questions. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Plaintiffs here alleged that each of the Warnings “misrepresent[s] or exaggerate[s] the potential effects of smoking” and that, “[c]ontrary to FDA’s characterization, the peer reviewers raised serious, substantive concerns about FDA’s studies” used to support the selected Warnings. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 2:38 am by Richmond Cariaga
This means that if new evidence emerges that could exonerate you, you likely won’t be able to pursue further legal action. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm
GlaxoSmithKline LLC (9th Cir. 2017) 858 F.3d 1227, 1237 (Wendell) [“Perhaps in some cases there will be a plethora of peer reviewed evidence that specifically shows causation. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 5:12 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include: EditorialIn This Issue; In This Issue – Reviews; EJIL Roll of Honour; 2023 EJIL Peer Reviewer Prize; 10 Good Reads 2023 Afterword: Antony Anghie and His Critics Ratna Kapur, TWAIL and Alternative Visions: ‘Talking About a Revolution’: Afterword to the Foreword by Antony Anghie Arnulf Becker Lorca, After TWAIL’s Success, What Next? [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:50 am by Eugene Volokh
[T]he Court dismisses most of Newman's antidiscrimination claims for failure to adequately plead the existence of a material adverse action caused by his race. [read post]