Search for: "In re: SAMUEL ELLIS" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
“Inside the courtroom, this is a case about upholding the law,” said John Samuel Gibson, attorney for Douglas Emmett. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Efforts like the Ethics Guide for Trustworthy AI assume the regulatory role of Miss Millie.[8]   Jan Broekman takes us to the edge of that gap between the human, and their technologies of re-production and memory, their elaborate systems of subjectivity that has moved humanity to the construction of virtual imaginaries of itself. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
“You’re too honest,” Trump berated Pence as he refused to go along with the election plot, according to the indictment. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
Senior Trump campaign legal adviser Jenna Ellis serves as special counsel to the Thomas More Society, which has filed lawsuits through the newly formed Amistad Project alleging problems with the vote in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Incluso, en adelante se reconocería su apellido, como verbo informal: “We’re going to bork him”, definido en la jerga de D.C. como “obstruct (someone, especially a candidate for public office) through systematic defamation or vilification“. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:06 am by Ronald Mann
Justice Samuel Alito scoffed at the idea that American courts should apply such a rule: “Well, what if the law of the jurisdiction whose law would be chosen permits arbitration without any consent whatsoever? [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
As such, we have rarely done copyright work for our clients, not because we’re not good at it, but because we feel that it is money that is not well spent. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 4:08 pm by Joshua Wagner
If we do find snakes we will for sure call Samuel L. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Transparency project discusses the Re X judgment and the issue of transparency versus confidentiality. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
Dempsey m2dempsey Villanova Stephen Diamond StephenFDiamond Santa Clara Darby Dickerson darbydickerson Texas Tech Amy Dillard adillard Baltimore Paul Diller dilleradollar Willamette Jim Dimitri profdimitri Indiana-McKinney John DiPippa jmdipippa Arkansas-Little Rock Scott Dodson ProfDodson Hastings Sean Patrick Donlon spdonlan Limerick (Ireland) Fiona Donson Fdonson  Univ College Cork Richard Dooling RichardDooling Nebrask Josh Douglas JoshuaADouglas Kentucky Randy Dryer medialawguy Utah Mary… [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 11:14 am by Timothy Sandefur, guest-blogging
But the Court refused, and the reason was that Justice Samuel Miller and his colleagues were unprepared to give effect to what they saw as a radical change in the Constitution’s federalist structure. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:30 am by David Oscar Markus
Court (In re Ellis), 356 F.3d1198, 1211 (9th Cir. 2004) (en banc). 5. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 Obviously, if we’re calling California conservative and Idaho liberal, then the issues associated with comment k don’t fit well into the usual legal cubby holes.Idaho, then – holding our noses all the way. [read post]