Search for: "In re B. G." Results 1 - 20 of 3,651
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
This term stated that customers must “tell us if anything changes while you’re insured with us” (the Notification Clause) (our emphasis) and was included within Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs) issued with approximately 1,377,900 contracts for home and contents insurance policies. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:33 pm
During my own visit to Kibbutz Be’eri and Kibbutz Kfar Aza, as well as to the site of Supernova Music Festival in Re’im, I saw the devastating scenes of these attacks and the profound impact of the unconscionable crimes charged in the applications filed today. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
The request's theory is that the post violated the copyright in a tumblr post, https://www.tumblr.com/case49news/745091056157196289/fourth-circuit-on-one-sided-pseudonymity-in-sexual: Re: Unknown NOTICE TYPE:DMCA Copyright claim 1 KIND OF WORK: Unspecified DESCRIPTION[:] [REDACTED] ORIGINAL URLS: https://www.tumblr.com/case49news/745091056157196289/fourth-circuit-on-one-sided-pseudonymity-in-sexual ALLEGEDLY INFRINGING URLS:… [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am by Eugene Volokh
On Wednesday, Google received a request that it remove that post from its indexes—and thus vanish it from search results—on the theory that the post violated the copyright in a blog post, https://europeannewschannels.blogspot.com/2024/01/fourth-circuit-on-one-sided.html: Re: Unknown NOTICE TYPE: DMCA Copyright claim 1 KIND OF WORK: Unspecified DESCRIPTION[:] The decision allows such pseudonymity when the defendant has already been found (by default judgment) to have committed… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
HUS is a frightening complication that even in the best American centers has a notable mortality rate.[56] Among survivors, at least 5 percent will suffer end stage renal disease (ESRD) with the resultant need for dialysis or transplantation.[57] But, “[b]ecause renal failure can progress slowly over decades, the eventual incidence of ESRD cannot yet be determined. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
PÉNAL (DROIT) — détermination de la peine — infractions contre la personne — voies de fait — victimes travailleuses du sexe — 2 victimes âgées de 18 ans — accusé âgé de 28 ans — antécédents judiciaires — risque élevé de récidive — délinquant dangereux — détention — durée indéterminée… [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1]  Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3]  One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:06 am by Alessandro Cerri
 The corollary question concern whether the position is different where an appeal is filed before the application is withdrawn - in which case Article 139(2)(b) EUTMR is not triggered and the conversion process can proceed. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm by vforberger
” In re Lowry, 138 N.Y.S.3d at 241-2. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]