Search for: "In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 59
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
Harvie Wilkinson's concurrence made the argument against one-sided pseudonymity in at least many such cases: I appreciate especially [the majority's] recognition of the potential for pseudonymous litigation to "undermine[] the public's right of access to judicial proceedings" and how "disclosing the parties' identities furthers openness of judicial proceedings. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
Harvie Wilkinson's concurrence made the argument against one-sided pseudonymity in at least many such cases: I appreciate especially [the majority's] recognition of the potential for pseudonymous litigation to "undermine[] the public's right of access to judicial proceedings" and how "disclosing the parties' identities furthers openness of judicial proceedings. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
Harvie Wilkinson's concurrence made the argument against one-sided pseudonymity in at least many such cases: I appreciate especially [the majority's] recognition of the potential for pseudonymous litigation to "undermine[] the public's right of access to judicial proceedings" and how "disclosing the parties' identities furthers openness of judicial proceedings. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
Harvie Wilkinson's concurrence made the argument against one-sided pseudonymity in at least many such cases: I appreciate especially [the majority's] recognition of the potential for pseudonymous litigation to "undermine[] the public's right of access to judicial proceedings" and how "disclosing the parties' identities furthers openness of judicial proceedings. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:31 am
Here again, the Court emphasizes that any procedural irregularities against plaintiff in the Smith proceeding are not enough to assert a Title IX violation. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 1:40 pm
(They could potentially argue that they’re not bound by federal law because they’re Congress and make the law, etc.) [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
Smith, 429 F.3d 706, 710 (7th Cir. 2005). [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 4:41 pm
“In attorney disciplinary proceedings, the Administrator must prove the alleged misconduct by clear and convincing evidence. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm
The Applicant publishers sought permission to report statutory police disciplinary proceedings in which the Police Misconduct Tribunal concluded that Terry Cooke had systematically abused his role as a police officer to pursue inappropriate and prohibited relationships with vulnerable women. 5RB’s summary can be read here. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:16 pm
Recently, in In re: Facebook Inc. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
While the Enea and Royal Dutch Shell actions were brought against the companies, these decisions have broader D&O liability implications. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Anyone involved in the disciplinary process or making a seniority determination in a layoff situation must consider these elements, as an employee’s rights to administrative due process and layoff rights, if any, depend on his or her actual, i.e., statutory, appointment status and the actual jurisdictional classification of the position to which he or she has been appointed. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Anyone involved in the disciplinary process or making a seniority determination in a layoff situation must consider these elements, as an employee’s rights to administrative due process and layoff rights, if any, depend on his or her actual, i.e., statutory, appointment status and the actual jurisdictional classification of the position to which he or she has been appointed. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 7:43 pm
An investigative panel that finds probable cause to believe that a judge or justice engaged in conduct that warrants public discipline by the Supreme Court may authorize a disciplinary or disability proceeding against the judge. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm
ABC News had an article “There are two versions of the facts at Ben Roberts-Smith’s defamation trial. [read post]
13 May 2021, 11:56 am
Even after being admitted to practice in Delaware pro hac vice, an out-of-state attorney may not: (i) sign pleadings; (ii) file documents with the Court; (iii) communicate directly with the Court; or (iv) attend proceedings without Delaware counsel (including calls with the court, mediation and arbitration proceedings), without express permission by the Court. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 9:33 am
Capitol, they shouted a simple message: “You’re outnumbered. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Most medical societies have shown no interest in taking disciplinary action against members on the basis of testimony given while serving as expert witnesses.[5] One notable exception is the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS). [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
Smith v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am
Smith describes the Bendectin plaintiffs’ lawyer Barry Nace in hagiographic terms, but omits his bar disciplinary proceedings.[2] Smith tells us that Nace had an impressive background in chemistry, and quotes him in an interview in which he described the evidentiary rules on scientific witness testimony as “scientific evidence crap. [read post]
