Search for: "In re Dow" Results 1 - 20 of 928
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On 24 May 2024 judgment on meaning was handed down by HHJ Lewis in Unity Plus Healthcare Ltd v Clay & Ors (Re Preliminary Issues) [2024] EWHC 1278 (KB). [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
The defendant appealed to the High court and Kerr J allowed the appeal on the basis that the claim was an abuse of process as it constituted an attempt to re-litigate issues previously determined and undermine the claimant’s criminal convictions. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In an article for the Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, Jolynn Dellinger, a Senior Lecturing Fellow at Duke Law, and Stephanie K. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by INFORRM
In his criminal trial, which was aborted and not re-tried due to concerns about the Lehrmann’s mental health, the former Staffer had pleaded not guilty. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The initial tests of the newly articulated standard for admissibility of opinion testimony in silicone litigation did not go well.[3]  Peer review, which was absent in the re-analyses relied upon in the Bendectin litigation, was superficially present in the studies relied upon in the silicone litigation. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm by admin
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 593-594 (1993). [2] Id. at 594 (internal citations omitted) (emphasis added). [3] Id [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:36 am by Dennis Crouch
 The briefing cites to other statements from the court about the meaning of obviousness, including: Dow Chem. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
The defendants applied for each claim to be struck out either as an abuse of process or on the basis that the claims disclose no real or substantial tort and the claimant applied to re-amend his Particulars of Claim. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. (1993) 509 U.S. 579, 593 (Daubert); see also Primiano v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
As we dive into the new year, we're filled with gratitude, excitement and unwavering determination. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Joiner had can cause small-cell lung cancer.[13] Perhaps the most egregious lapses in scholarship occur when Ranges, a newly minted scientist, and her co-author, a full professor of law, write: “For example, Bendectin, an antinausea medication prescribed to pregnant women, caused a slew of birth defects (hence its nickname ‘The Second Thalidomide’).49”[14] I had to re-read this sentence many times to make sure I was not hallucinating. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm by admin
Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) (No. 92-102) (proposing that publication in a peer-reviewed journal be the primary criterion for admitting scientifc evidence in the courtroom). [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
Importantly, “vindication is an aspect of the award so that if the allegations should re-emerge, the damages must be large enough to proclaim the baselessness of the libel” [7]. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:18 am by Seán Binder
While Musk has since deleted the post, he promoted two accounts “for following the war in real-time” that previously falsely claimed there had been an explosion near the White House in May, briefly causing the Dow Jones stock index to drop by 85 points. [read post]