Search for: "In re Jeffrey P. (1990)"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Congressional and agency hearings in the early 1990s amplified some public concern, but in 1990, the Director of Cardio-Renal Drug Products, at the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, found several well-supported facts, based upon robust evidence. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Joiner had can cause small-cell lung cancer.[13] Perhaps the most egregious lapses in scholarship occur when Ranges, a newly minted scientist, and her co-author, a full professor of law, write: “For example, Bendectin, an antinausea medication prescribed to pregnant women, caused a slew of birth defects (hence its nickname ‘The Second Thalidomide’).49”[14] I had to re-read this sentence many times to make sure I was not hallucinating. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
Keller’s earlier, three-volume trilogy on the history of public life between the Civil War and the New Deal—Affairs of State: Public Life in Late Nineteenth Century America (1977); Regulating a New Economy: Public Policy and Economic Change in America, 1900-1933 (1990); and Regulating a New Society: Public Policy and Social Change in America, 1900–1933 (1994)—is brimming with people, places, and events. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Do Critics of Police Have the First Amendment Procedural Protections That Nazis Get?
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
See In re T.R. (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 6, 16 n.9 (adult civil and criminal proceedings are "presumptively open to the public"); State ex rel. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
See In re T.R. (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 6, 16 n.9 (adult civil and criminal proceedings are "presumptively open to the public"); State ex rel. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
Even more encouraging, the majority looks to Restatement (Second) of Torts § 388, p. 301 (1963–1964), for defining the “general duty of care includes a duty to warn when the manufacturer “knows or has reason to know” that its product “is or is likely to be dangerous for the use for which it is supplied” and the manufacturer “has no reason to believe” that the product’s users will realize that danger. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 5:55 am
For this example, we’re using Double-Declining Balance, so the rate of acceleration would be 2. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 12:10 pm
Jeffrey S. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Take Payday Lenders and Arbitration as a Textbook Case: What is the Majority Position on Litigation Waiver and Who Got It Right? [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
" In re Innovatio IP Ventures, 2013 WL 5593609, at *9 (N.D. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 2:25 pm
Jeffrey P. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
Jeffrey G. [read post]
14 May 2016, 6:30 pm
Jeffrey P. [read post]
14 May 2016, 6:30 pm
Jeffrey P. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm
Plaintiff Jeffrey A. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
Eileen and I, together with Miami immigration attorney, Jeffrey A. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
Eileen and I, together with Miami immigration attorney, Jeffrey A. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm
Eileen and I, together with Miami immigration attorney, Jeffrey A. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 6:30 pm
For this last week: Brooks (Re) 2013 CanLII 54306 (ON RC)1. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
