Search for: "In re Joseph (1989)"
Results 1 - 20
of 134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In a memorandum opinion and order issued on March 27, 2024, in In re Yellow Corporation, et. al., Judge Craig T. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Med. 827 (1989). [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
On July 27, 2023, US federal banking regulators issued proposals to (i) significantly revise the risk-based regulatory capital requirements for certain midsize and larger US banking organizations (the “Capital Proposal”), and (ii) change the method for calculating the capital surcharge for globally systemically important banking organizations (“G-SIBs”) (the “G-SIB Surcharge Proposal”).1 These proposals are of critical importance because the amount of capital a… [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
Infamous for their 1989 album, “As Nasty as They Wanna Be,” they were the first band to ever have an album deemed legally obscene (though the decision was later overturned), and they were sued successfully by George Lucas over their trademark-infringing label name, Skyywalker Records. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 1:05 am
Among their creditors was Joseph (“Lil’ Joe”) Weinberger, a tax lawyer who served as Luke Records’ CFO and in-house counsel. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
A discussion focused on the role Sandy’s essay played in stimulating Second Amendment scholarship and how that scholarship caused the courts to re-examine the right to keep and bear arms, a re-examination that ultimately brought us Heller and now Bruen would have been entirely appropriate. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 4:39 am
How different from February 1989, when the fatwa was announced on account of The Satanic Verses. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 11:43 am
by Neil H. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In 1989, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit resolved an appeal involving expert witnesses who relied upon epidemiologic studies by concluding that it did not have to resolve questions of bias and confounding because the studies relied upon had presented their results with confidence intervals.[4] Judges and expert witnesses persistently interpreted single confidence intervals from one study as having a 95 percent probability of containing the actual parameter.[5]… [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:42 am
For Freedom of Press (1989). [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 6:06 pm
"For God's sake, this man cannot remain in power" (Joseph Biden, Remarks Warsaw Poland 16 March 2022). . . . [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In 1989, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit resolved an appeal involving expert witnesses who relied upon epidemiologic studies by concluding that it did not have to resolve questions of bias and confounding because the studies relied upon had presented their results with confidence intervals.[4] Judges and expert witnesses persistently interpreted single confidence intervals from one study as having a 95 percent probability of containing the actual parameter.[5]… [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm
After two new justices were confirmed, the court ordered re-argument, so Weddington again took the lectern in October 1972. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:21 am
See, e.g., In re Benjamin, 33 Mass. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Rakoff, Judge, Southern District of New York Channing Robertson, Professor of Engineering, Stanford University Joseph V. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 11:04 am
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction Evaluating the Federal R&D ax Credit Effectiveness of the R&D Tax Credit — Does the R&D Credit Increase R&D Spending? [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 8:30 pm
Prosecutors allege Douglass Mackey used an alias, reportedly derived from actor Charlie Sheen’s character Ricky Vaughn in the 1989 film “Major League,” to circulate messages on Twitter that encouraged Clinton’s supporters to “Avoid the line. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
INTRODUCTION Letters of intent are pre-contract documents. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am
A year earlier, in 1989, the New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed a judgment against du Pont in a case brought by employees who established at trial that their employer had intentionally harmed them with respect to their use of asbestos.[3] One of the plaintiffs’ key “state of the art” witnesses throughout the 1980s and 1990s was Gerrit W. [read post]
